A strong science budget, but NIH heading for a cliff

February 2, 2010 at 10:17 pm 1 comment

In his annual budget request to Congress, President Obama on Monday recommended strong funding increases for many scientific agencies that support the life sciences. However, the president’s budget request for the National Institutes of Health is unlikely to prevent a decline in biomedical research in 2011.

The president’s budget request for 2011 includes a $7.4 billion recommendation for the National Science Foundation.  This request would increase the NSF’s budget by nearly $498 million, or 8 percent, compared with 2010.

In a positive sign for biologists and biochemists, the NSF’s budget request for its Biological Directorate nearly kept pace with the NSF budget as a whole.  The president recommended increasing the Biological Directorate’s budget to nearly $768 million, an increase of 7.5 percent.  The Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences is also slated for an 6.4 percent increase.

During the NSF’s budget request presentation on Feb. 1, Director Arden Bement said the NSF had “developed the right programs that the administration wanted to support.” The NSF’s programming contributed to the larger-than-projected budget recommendation for the administration, Bement said.

The NSF budget request presentation focused on a variety of programs in areas like climate change, energy, education and innovation, which directly align with the priorities of the administration.

But the request for the National Institutes of Health is not nearly as positive. The president’s request for the NIH is $32 billion, an increase of $1 billion or 3.2 percent from 2010.  This includes a 3.2 percent increase for the National Cancer Institute and a 3.6 percent increase for the National Institute for General Medical Sciences.

Without considering the nearly $5 billion in stimulus funding that the NIH will spend in 2010, the president’s budget request represents a flat budget for the NIH.  Because of high rates of inflation in biomedical sectors, the 3.2 percent increase over 2010’s $31 billion budget just compensates for losses due to inflation.

Some in the biomedical community were quick to congratulate the president.  In a statement, Mark Lively, president of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, said that it “clearly indicates that research is a high priority.”

“This is the largest proposed funding increase for the National Institutes of Health we have seen in a President’s budget in eight years,” Lively said.

But the president’s $32 billion request is in stark contrast to FASEB’s own recommendation.  In its annual federal funding report, FASEB recommends an NIH budget of $37 billion and says “additional resources are needed to pursue the historic level of scientific opportunities available today and uphold the nation’s role as a leader in medical research.”

The discrepancy between the president’s budget and FASEB’s recommendation is primarily due to accounting for stimulus money.  The American Reinvestment and Recovery act, or stimulus bill, gave the NIH an additional $10 billion above its existing budget to invest in biomedical research from 2009-2010.

Accounting for stimulus spending, the NIH spent approximately $36 billion in 2010.  The president’s budget represents a drastic $4 billion decrease from these levels.

The investment from the stimulus bill has been a vital boost to biomedical research.  The NIH has used the money to support 12,000 grants and may have supported as many as 50,000 jobs.

As stimulus funding expires, much of this important research will come to end as NIH research budgets significantly decline.  The NIH 2011 budget summary predicts that the president’s budget would support nearly 200 fewer research project grants than in 2010.

While the news is mixed for the NIH, other agencies faired better.  The president’s budget recommends a $226 million, or a 4.6 percent, increase for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science and a $167 million, or a 63 percent, increase for the National Institute of Food and Agriculture’s Agricultural and Food Research Initiative, a part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Budget overviews for the NIH and NSF can be found on the agency’s respective Web sites.  A full overview of the president’s budget can be found here.  Departmental fact sheets are available from the Office of Management and Budget.

About these ads

Entry filed under: NIH, NSF, Science Funding, Stimulus/recovery. Tags: .

NIH needs $37 billion in 2011 Help wanted: federal science policy leaders

1 Comment Add your own

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

ASBMB Tweets

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

RSS ASBMB News

  • New JBC Podcast: vitmain C’s potential role in epigenetics — an interview with Geofeng Wang
    May 10 2013 — In the latest JBC podcast we hear an interview with Gaofeng Wang at the University of Miami Wang talks about his Paper of the Week Ascorbate Induces Ten-Eleven Translocation Methylcytosine Dioxygenase-mediated Generation of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine The paper delves into how vitamin C may play a role in epigenetics Click here to listen to the pod […]
  • Grant Writing Workshop for Early Career Faculty
    June 8 2013 -- The ASBMB is hosting a grant writing workshop for new and early career biochemistry and molecular biology faculty June 27 – 29 in Washington D.C.  This workshop specifically targets new tenure-track faculty who have not previously received NSF or NIH funding. Key features of the workshop will be:  Talks by NSF and NIH program officers about fu […]
  • Online now: May 2013 issue of ASBMB Today
    May 1 2013 — In the May issue of ASBMB Today we explore what we know — and what we need to know — about sperm and how it relates to male infertility The fourth and fifth installments of our personal essay series “Derailed but Undeterred,” are by Christine Guthrie who candidly tells how she prevailed through a particularly dark period when she was a young inv […]
  • 2013 Undergraduate Poster Competition Winners and Honorable Mentions
    The 17th Annual ASBMB Undergraduate Student Research Poster competition was held in Boston this year during the Experimental Biology 2013 conference.  More than 260 undergraduates submitted abstracts to this year's competition.  The following are the winners and honorable mentions. Cell Signaling Best Poster Winner Kelly Biette, Seattle University Cell […]
  • LSUHSC research discovers new drug target for metastatic breast cancer
    April 15 2013 — Research led by Dr Suresh Alahari Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans is the first to report that two specific tumor suppressor genes work in concert to inhibit the growth and spread of breast tumor cells to the lungs The research was published last week online in The Journal of Biological […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: