Federal reports point to R&D as the key to American innovation

January 20, 2012 at 3:22 pm Leave a comment

We’re only three weeks into the new year, and a barrage of federal reports that focus on the status of American competitiveness and innovation capacity already have been released. Not surprisingly, the connection between research and education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields and a strong national economy was highlighted in each report.

On Jan. 6, the Department of Commerce delivered The Competitive and Innovative Capacity of the U.S. report to Congress. The report outlines the three elements of innovation — basic research, education and infrastructure — and goes on to state that these areas require a strong and sustained federal investment to flourish.

The Commerce report presents ten policy recommendations, the first of which is for continued support for basic research through federal funding. Other recommendations include expanding R&D tax credits, improving STEM education and eliminating the barriers associated with translational research. Read a summary of the report here.

In February 2011, President Obama created the Jobs Council, which was tasked with developing a set of recommendations that would create jobs in the short term and improve American competitiveness in the long term. On Jan. 17, the Jobs Council released a new report titled Road Map to Renewal. It identifies six areas that are critical to address the president’s goal: education, research and development, energy, manufacturing, regulatory reform and tax reform.

The Jobs Council report presents several recommendations for each of the six topics. Of particular interest to the basic research community is the recommendation to raise the national investment in R&D to at least 3 percent of gross domestic product. The U.S. currently invests 2.8 percent of GDP to R&D, while countries such as Japan and Sweden invest 3.4 and 3.7 percent, respectively. Read a summary of the report here.

Finally, on Jan. 18, the National Science Board, the policy-making body at the National Science Foundation, released its yearly report on Science and Engineering Indicators. This report outlines trends in U.S. global competitiveness in the science and technology work force, education and economic activity. While the U.S. remains the leader in supporting science and technology, that lead could soon be overtaken as countries in Asia, particularly China, continue to increase their national investments in R&D.

The report shows that between 1999 and 2009 the U.S. investment in R&D dropped from 38 percent to 31 percent, whereas it grew from 24 percent to 35 percent in the “Asia-10″ (China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand). Read the report digest here, or visit the NSF website to explore specific topics like STEM education, global R&D trends or the science work force.

These reports all indicate that the key to maintaining America’s global competitiveness lies in its commitment to federal support for research and development. Countless studies have shown that STEM occupations are among the highest paying, fastest growing and most influential in driving economic growth and innovation. The ASBMB Office of Public Affairs will continue to bring you studies such as these that help support the argument for a strong investment in research.

Advertisement

Entry filed under: America COMPETES, NSF, White House. Tags: .

NIH outlines future of NCRR grants on the heels of NCATS creation President Obama highlights the importance of basic research in the State of the Union address

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

ASBMB Tweets

 

January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

RSS ASBMB News

  • Apply Now for the ASBMB Hill Day
    The ASBMB Public Affairs Advisory Committee sponsors an annual "Hill Day," during which students and postdocs from around the country come to Washington D.C to meet with their congressional representatives. Participants partake in a "policy 101" training session before breaking into small groups for a full day of congressional meetings Th […]
  • Biochemistry community comments on President's FY13 budget
    ASBMB calls on Congress for a 4.5% increase in funding for NIH Feb 13 2012 — Earlier today President Barack Obama released his budget plan for fiscal year 2013 a budget which funds the federal government at a level of $3.8 trillion The National Institutes of Health — the world’s largest public investor in biomedical research — has been recommended to receive […]
  • Online Now: February 2012 issue of ASBMB Today
      Online Now February 2012 issue of ASBMB Today Feb 1 212 – In this month's issue of ASBMB Today we highlight the 2012 Special Symposia Series report the results of a new survey about ASBMB women in academe and profile several of our annual award winners Meanwhile science writer Raj Mukhopadhyay talks to Phil Leder and F Anne Stephenson about their care […]
  • Protein structures give disease clues
    Studies show what UC-Davis can do with nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer Feb 1 2012 — Using some of the most powerful nuclear magnetic resonance equipment available researchers at the University of California Davis are making discoveries about the shape and structure of biological molecules -- potentially leading to new ways to treat or prevent disease […]
  • In lab, Pannexin1 restores tight binding of cells lost in cancer
    By studying tumor cell behavior in a novel “scaffold-free” 3-D system researchers have determined that the protein Pannexin1 may play an important biomechanical role in binding tissues together an effect that is lost in cancerous cells PROVIDENCE R.I [Brown University] Jan 30 2012 — First there is the tumor and then there’s the horrible question of whether t […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.